by Rabbi Dr. Stuart Dauermann
Now Balak the son of Tzippor saw all that Isra'el had done to the Emori. Mo'av was very afraid of the people, because there were so many of them; Mo'av was overcome with dread because of the people of Isra'el. So Mo'av said to the leaders of Midyan, "This horde will lick up everything around us, the way an ox licks up grass in the field." Balak the son of Tzippor was king of Mo'av at that time. He sent messengers to Bil'am the son of B'or, at P'tor by the [Euphrates] River in his native land, to tell him, "Listen, a people has come out of Egypt, spread over all the land and settled down next to me. Therefore, please come, and curse this people for me, because they are stronger than I am. Maybe I will be able to strike them down and drive them out of the land, for I know that whomever you bless is in fact blessed, and whomever you curse is in fact cursed." (Num 22:2-6)
Throughout our history, especially whenever we have dwelt in other people's lands, the Jewish people have been regarded as intruders and as a threat.
This is still the case. Balak's animosity and paranoia concerning the Jewish people is paradigmatic of the Jewish historical experience. And for this reason, the survival of the Jewish people and of the Jewish homeland are interrelated.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
by Paula K.
This parasha is primarily about leadership and how people are to relate to their leaders. Moses and Aaron were chosen emissaries of G-d to lead His people Israel. Korach and some of those in his circle took exception to this. They confronted Moses and Aaron and questioned their leadership. Their argument was that Israel was G-d's chosen people, and they were all holy - Moses and Aaron were the same as everyone; no holier than anyone else. Korach and his followers expected an explanation, but that is not what they got.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
by Rabbi Russ Resnik
Years ago, when I worked as a salesman, our manager gave everyone a copy of the book Dress for Success.1 This was more than a fashion book. Rather, it was a study of how different styles and colors influenced one's effectiveness. In one test, a man wearing a beige raincoat asked people passing by for handouts and collected a tidy sum. Later he did the same in a gray raincoat and came up empty-handed. The book abounds with examples like this. Apparently, at least on a human level, clothes do make the man.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|